IMF Agreements, Energy Tariffs, and the Politics of Misinformation
The claim that the NPP government is “bowing to the IMF” on electricity tariffs conveniently omits a fundamental fact: the IMF agreement was neither designed nor signed by the NPP. It was negotiated and concluded under Ranil Wickremesinghe’s government, with Ali Sabry—then Finance Minister—as the chief political signatory.
Ali Sabry is a lawyer by training, not an economist, has no Fiscal policy experience and the IMF programme was finalised during a period when Parliament had little effective oversight, public legitimacy was weak, and crisis governance prevailed. To now accuse the NPP of ideological betrayal for continuing an inherited agreement is not analysis—it is political sleight of hand.
Who Signed the IMF Agreement—and Why It Matters
The IMF Extended Fund Facility was signed in early 2023 under Ranil Wickremesinghe’s administration, at a moment when Sri Lanka was already in default and starved of external financing. The NPP did not create the programme, design its conditionalities, or commit the country to cost-reflective pricing.
What the NPP has done—unlike its predecessors—is avoid policy recklessness by continuing the programme to preserve fiscal stability, currency credibility, and debt restructuring momentum. Walking away from the IMF at this stage would not be “economic freedom”; it would be fiscal vandalism.
Continuity in a crisis is not ideological surrender. It is responsible governance.
No “Socialist IMF”, No Ideological Deception
The repeated use of the term “Socialist government” in this context is deliberately misleading. The NPP has never claimed that IMF programmes are socialist, nor has it promised price controls divorced from economic reality.
What it has committed to is fairness in implementation:
-
Transparent utility pricing
-
Protection of low-income households
-
Targeted subsidies rather than blanket distortions
-
Ending hidden cross-subsidies that benefit large corporate consumers
Fair utility pricing is not neoliberal austerity, nor is it anti-people socialism. It is basic public finance.
The CEB Delay: Bureaucratic Failure Is Not IMF Subservience
The failure of the CEB to submit tariff revision proposals on time is a bureaucratic and institutional issue, not proof of IMF coercion. In fact, the delay prevented an automatic 11.57% increase—contradicting the narrative that the government blindly obeys IMF “whips.”
What the opposition refuses to acknowledge is this:
under previous governments, tariff hikes were imposed without delay, without debate, and without mitigation.
The current administration is attempting to:
-
Rationalise tariffs gradually
-
Improve regulatory oversight through the PUCSL
-
Address inefficiencies before passing costs to consumers
That is precisely what responsible reform looks like.
The Real Electricity Mafia Was Protected for Decades
There is an electricity mafia. But it did not emerge under the NPP.
It flourished under:
-
Politically protected emergency diesel contracts
-
Inflated coal procurement deals
-
Deliberate obstruction of renewable energy entrants
-
Long-term PPAs favouring cronies
These networks were nurtured during the Rajapaksa and Wickremesinghe eras. To accuse a government that has been in office for months of “protecting” a mafia that took decades to build is intellectually dishonest.
Dismantling entrenched corruption is not done through press releases or overnight tariff freezes. It requires audits, prosecutions, contract reviews, and regulatory reform—processes that are underway but politically inconvenient for those who benefited from the old system.
Independence Day and the False Choice Narrative
The suggestion that Sri Lanka is “not free” because it must manage its finances responsibly is a false binary.
Real independence does not mean:
-
Free electricity regardless of cost
-
Ignoring debt obligations
-
Printing money to fund inefficiency
Real independence means:
-
Ending elite capture of public utilities
-
Making costs visible instead of hidden
-
Ensuring that reforms are socially balanced, not crony-driven
For the first time in decades, Sri Lanka has a government attempting to reform without distributing licences, contracts, and monopolies to friends and family.
Criticism Is Valid—Distortion Is Not
Criticising tariff increases is legitimate. Questioning energy policy is healthy. But rewriting history to pin an IMF programme, fiscal collapse, and structural decay on the NPP is not critique—it is misinformation.
The IMF agreement belongs to Ranil Wickremesinghe’s government.
The crisis belongs to decades of misrule.
The task of stabilisation belongs to the present.
And for once, Sri Lanka is trying to do it without lies.