Visa Bans, Ethics, and the GMOA Strike: A New International Front Opens Against Sri Lanka’s Striking Doctors
By a Colombowire Special Correspondent
A controversial new front is opening against Sri Lanka’s striking government doctors—one that stretches far beyond hospital wards and picket lines, reaching diplomatic missions in London, Brussels, Canberra, Washington, and the Middle East.
According to multiple sources familiar with the developments, a group of independent civil society organisations and diaspora-based accountability networks are preparing to formally lobby foreign governments to impose visa restrictions on Sri Lankan doctors participating in the proposed strike action called by the Government Medical Officers’ Association (GMOA).
At the centre of the storm is the GMOA Secretary General, Dr. Prabath Sugasdasa, who has called for island-wide strike action starting tomorrow, despite the government publicly stating its willingness to continue dialogue and negotiate outstanding grievances.
The Ethical Argument: “Doctors Are Not Like Other Professionals”
Campaigning groups argue that the strike crosses a fundamental ethical red line.
“Doctors are not like other professionals,” said a representative of one organisation coordinating submissions to foreign missions. “They hold lives in their hands. Walking away from public hospitals, particularly during a fragile economic recovery, is not merely an industrial action—it is an ethical breach.”
The groups contend that organised withdrawal of medical services violates internationally recognised principles of medical ethics, including beneficence, non-maleficence, and duty of care, principles that are explicitly cited by medical regulators in the UK, EU, Australia, New Zealand, and several Gulf states.
A New Strategy: Naming, Listing, and Diplomatic Pressure
What makes this episode unprecedented is the strategy being pursued.
Sources confirm that verified lists of doctors participating in strike action are allegedly being compiled by independent watchdog bodies. These lists, it is claimed, will be submitted to diplomatic missions of countries where Sri Lankan doctors commonly seek employment, training placements, or long-term migration.
The objective is not criminal prosecution, but immigration scrutiny.
“Visa regimes are discretionary,” said a London-based legal analyst familiar with UK Home Office policy. “If a credible case is made that an applicant has acted in ways inconsistent with professional ethics, host countries are entitled to consider that in character and suitability assessments.”
UK, EU, Australia, New Zealand, and the Middle East in Focus
Sri Lankan doctors have, for decades, benefited from streamlined pathways into:
-
The UK’s NHS
-
EU healthcare systems facing workforce shortages
-
Australia and New Zealand’s skilled migration programmes
-
Middle Eastern state-run hospital networks
Campaigners argue that these countries should not become “safe harbours” for professionals who, in their view, abandon public service obligations at home while seeking ethical credibility abroad.
The Private Practice Question
Another serious allegation gaining traction is the claim that some striking doctors may continue private channeling during strike periods.
“If a doctor withdraws services from a public hospital but continues private practice on the same day, that raises serious ethical and regulatory concerns,” one submission draft seen by this publication states.
Such conduct, if proven, could expose doctors not only to immigration consequences abroad but also to domestic professional disciplinary action.
Public Investment, Private Gain?
The controversy also revives a long-standing public grievance: state-funded medical education.
Sri Lankan doctors are trained almost entirely at public expense. In addition, many receive duty-free vehicle permits, a benefit justified on the basis of public service.
Activists now question whether:
-
Income earned outside government service is fully declared and taxed
-
Strike action violates the implicit social contract underpinning these privileges
“These benefits are not entitlements in perpetuity,” said a former Treasury official. “They are conditional on public service.”
GMOA Under International Scrutiny
The GMOA has historically positioned itself as a powerful guardian of doctors’ rights. However, critics argue that its tactics increasingly resemble political brinkmanship, rather than principled advocacy.
By calling for strike action while negotiations remain open, critics say the union has exposed its members to consequences far beyond domestic labour disputes.
A Dangerous Precedent—or Long-Overdue Accountability?
Whether visa bans will actually materialise remains uncertain. Diplomatic missions contacted by this publication declined to comment on hypothetical scenarios.
Yet the message being sent is unmistakable: professional conduct at home may now follow doctors across borders.
For Sri Lanka’s medical community, the warning is stark. In an interconnected world, ethical decisions made in Colombo can echo in London, Sydney, Berlin, Riyadh, and beyond.
And for the first time, a strike at home may come with a price paid overseas.